|
|
Type: |
OP | Curs: |
4 | Period: |
S semester |
ECTS Credits: |
5 ECTS |
Group | Teacher | Department | Language |
---|---|---|---|
Steven Guest | Dirección de Personas y Organización | ENG |
13. Empathy |
18. Influence |
10. Adaptability, flexibility |
9. Autonomy, independence, initiative, pro-activeness |
8. Quality orientation and achievement |
1. 1: Getting a feel for negotiationsThe first week is given over to the general mechanics of negotiation skills. Here we will act out cases which allow students to develop their understanding of the tactics of distributive negotiations. Students should leave knowing how to defend against competitive bargaining and understand the mechanics of how many legal negotiators approach conflict resolution problems.Read BW, "Introduction," pp. 1 - 8. Strategy and tactics of distributive bargaining. Lewicki. Negotiation Chap 3. |
2. 2. How lawyers use the distributive mechanismHere we use to cases where the law enters into play in the negotiation process. We identify solutions to the cases and contemplate how asymmetric information situations make us lean towards risk taking. We look at the importance of a scientific approach to understanding possible negotiation outcomesRead. Read BW, ch. 1, pp. 9 - 43. Secrets of power negotiating. R Dawson in Lewicki Negotiation |
3. 3. Developing a principled approach to negotiationsHere we use the principled negotiation model to understand how lawyers can develop a win-win outcome. Students practise with the model. We examine the Thomas Kilman conflict modes and self-test students to find their current approach.Review BW, pp. 44 - 69. Read Strategy and tactics of Integrative Bargaining. Lewicki Negotiation |
4. 4. Lawyers and their expertise to determine likely outcomesThis part of the course examines how lawyers can use their legal expertise as a basis for determining the bargaining zone outside the litigation route to conflict management.We look at expected outcomes methodology in a variety of case situations Read BW, ch. 4, pp. 97 - 126. Read Three approaches to resolving conflicts. Lewicki Negotiation |
5. 5. To compete or collaborate?The zealous defence of a clients¿ position is perhaps one of the key characteristics of lawyers. Here we examine the efficiencies of competition as opposed to collaboration. We explore the role of trust in relationships and see how to build trust through calculated steps.Read DC, chs. 5 - 6, pp. 83 - 128. Read. Consider both the relationships and the substance in negotiation: Lewicki Negotiation |
6. 6. Communication and emotional intelligenceOne of the competencies required for good negotiations skills is communication. Here students experiment with communication techniques in a case situation. The skills learnt here dovetail into the ideas of competition/collaborative frames and we understand how to reduce the tension between asserting our position and understanding others¿ positions. The discussion is extended here to include the role of emotional intelligence in lawyers¿ armoury. Students carry out their first feedback sessions to understand how others perceive them.Read BW, ch. 2, 67 - 97. Read Perception Cognition and Communication. Lewicki Negotiation |
7. 7. Behind the table negotiationsUnderstanding clients is a core ability of good lawyers. This part of the course contracts the potential objectives of clients and lawyers and develops an understanding of the principal ¿ agent relationship and the potential pitfalls of cross-objectives. Lawyers need to be able to negotiate objectives before and during negotiations and as such behind the table conflict resolution is a key part of the role of representatives in legal settings.Read BW, chs. 7, pp.173 - 203. |
8. 8. Creating valueThis is a key development in the students¿ ability to negotiation because they explore methodology that enables them to overcome the tension between creating and sharing value during a legal negotiation. Students find innovative solutions to legal negotiations during the course of simulation that help them to understand how to create value and how this can reduce competitive approaches that might destroy value.BW. Chap 5. Pp 127 - 156 |
9. 9. Contacts and negotiationsStudents learn the key technique of loggrolling across different issues in the negotiation of a contact. We see how contract terminology is used to enhance negotiation positions and how more cognitive issues can effect the outcomes of conflict resolution. We explore the psychological aspects of negotiators.Read BW, ch. 9, pp. 224 |
10. 10. The process of legal negociationDifferent phases occur in negotiations and it is important that lawyers see these for what they are. We explore a commercial negotiation and a litigation negotiation to follow these processes.Read BW, pp. 204 - 224. |
11. 11. Loggrolling in practiceStduents carry out scored loggrolling silulations to understand how to create opportunities and share growth. Here we explore the role of score cards to help understand pareto efficency in negotiations.Assignment: Prepare to negotiate Powerscreen. Read BW, ch. 5, pp. 127 - 155. |
12. 12. Case : PowerscreenThis case is a multi issue case that requires students to develop the skills developed so far. |
13. 13. Contingency contractsThe use of contingency in contracts provides students with exception value creation opportunities as well as a way of risk allocation. Students understand when and how contingencies are used in contracts and deal making which is a key feature in lawyering. We also examine the risk of over lawyering and complete contracts.Read BW: Chap 10 pp 224 |
14. 14. Class actions and muti-party negotiationsWhen more than two parties are involved in legal negotiations we can find complex relations between strong and weak stakeholders in the negotiation process. We develop methods to create fair results in multi-party conflicts.Read BW, ch. 12, pp. 295 ¿ 314 |
15. 15. Alternative Dispute ResolutionThe legal process offer one solution to resolving dispute, but it isn¿t necessarily the right one. One alternative is to negotiate a solution and yet the are others that can be just as efficient. The ADR literature is now highly developed and we explore different types of opportunities available.Read. 5 ways to keep disputes out of court. Allison J ADR. Why it works and why it doesn¿t. Vondra A.; Carver. T. |
16. 16. Ethics and moralityThe last sessions are devoted to the role of ethics and morality in negotiations. Lawyers have a ontological and legal understanding of what they should do in negotiations. We explore what norms should given or guide what lawyers do in the course of negotiations. Feedback session and peers reviews.Read Jonathan R. Cohen, "When People are the Means: Negotiating With Respect," 14 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 739-802 (2001). BW, ch. 11, 274 - 294. When is it legal to lie in negotiations. R Shell |
17. 17. Flora¿s houseStudents carry out a four party dispute negotiation |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |
Exam | |||||||||||||||||
Case Report | |||||||||||||||||
Negotiation Journal | |||||||||||||||||
Simulation/participation |
Description | % |
---|---|
Exam | 30 |
Case Report | 20 |
Negotiation Journal | 30 |
Simulation/participation | 20 |
Group | Teacher | Department |
---|---|---|
Steven Guest | Dirección de Personas y Organización |