|
Tipo: |
OPT | Curso: |
1 | Periodo: |
S semestre |
Créditos ECTS: |
4 ECTS |
Grupo | Profesor | Departamento | Idioma |
---|---|---|---|
Year 1 | Gemma Lligadas González | Derecho | ENG |
1. Session 1: Introduction: Governance, National and Global InstitutionsIn this class we introduce the basic concepts of the course, including the main concepts, actors, themes and issues we will cover throughout the course, the distinction between domestic and international political spheres, and the connections between the two. The introductory lecture will also outline the structure of the course, its learning objectives, clarify basic terms and concepts. |
2. Session 2: Formulating Preferences: What do States Want?In order to world politics¿and, especially, how the interactions between global and national institutions shape behavior¿it is essential to begin by looking within states. What goals do states seek to achieve when they interact with one another at the international level? When are the interests of developed and developing states aligned, and when are they at odds with one another? What is that that international organizations (IOs) can do? In this class, we seek to unpack these dynamics. We look, first, at the challenges that many states face and seek to address through international cooperation. We then examine the various ways of thinking about how states decide what it is they want before they join each other at the bargaining table. And, finally, we consider the benefits that IOs and other international institutions can provide, states to achieve their goals.Required Readings: ¿ Alden, Crhis and Amnon Aran (2017). Foreign |
3. Session 3: Policymaking at the International Level: How Do they Get It?As seen the last class, states have many objectives and aims at the international level. Sometimes these are closely aligned, and agreement is easy. But they often conflict as well, making it difficult to know who will get what. This class builds on what we learned in the previous one, but takes states ¿preferences¿ as given. We now examine the institutional environments that states negotiate within, which shape how collective decisions get made in the broadest sense. We also look at the different sources of bargaining power that states have within these environments, paying special attention to unique strategies available to powerful and less-powerful states. We then consider the specific bargaining dynamics that occur as states attempt to achieve positive outcomes and the process of forming bargaining groups design to gain leverage over others. Finally, we examine what determines ¿success¿ and ¿failure¿ in international negotiations.Required Readings: ¿ Frieden, Jeffry, David Lake and Kenneth Schultz (2010). World Politics: Interests, Institutions, Interactions. W. W. Norton & Company. Chapter 2. ¿ Narlikar, Amrita (2003). International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT & WTO. New York: Routledge. Chapter 1. |
4. Session 4: The United Nations: The Centerpiece of Global GovernanceThe UN and its associated bodies and technical agencies provide one of the most important platforms for dealing with global governance challenges. Yet, it is also in almost perpetual need to justify the existence of its costly bureaucracy and sprawling development system. This week we will discuss the UN¿s changing role and achievements from the immediate postwar period, through decolonialization, and into the era of global development initiatives such as the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals. Throughout, we will focus on the challenges of coordinating interests of states within the UN¿s governance structure. We will close with an outlook on the UN¿s difficulties to respond to new developments discussed in subsequent weeks of this course, such as the growing importance of rising powers like China and the increased incidence of fragility and humanitarian crises.Required Readings: - Ian Hurd (2020). International Organizations; Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge University Press, Chapter 4 (United Nations). |
5. Session 5: Preparation for the Simulation ExerciseDuring week 6 we will be conducting a simulation of international diplomacy, which is designed to allow you apply and deepen your understanding of the relationship between state decision-making and international institutions. This class (session 5) will be devoted to preparing for this simulation exercise. The exercise itself will be introduced in some detail, and the different roles that students will be assuming will be allocated. We will then focus on developing individual and group-based strategies for the exercise, relying on the various concepts and ideas developed in the previous weeks.Required Readings: ¿ Jones, Emily (2013). Negotiating Against the Odds: A Guide for Trade Negotiators from Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Chapters 2 & 4. |
6. Session 6: Simulation ExerciseDuring this week we will be conducting the simulation itself. Students will be expected to participate fully in the exercise and will be responsible for executing the strategies developed in the previous session/week. The exercise will develop our understanding of international interactions relevant to the study of world politics. This will provide an opportunity to apply the concepts and ideas discussed in the class and thereby deepen our understanding of the practice of national and global governance. The lessons learned here will be reflected on throughout the remainder of the class.Required Readings: ¿ None. |
7. Session 7: International Security in the XXI century: anti-terrorism international policies. Close look at the UNSCOne of the most fruitful but controversial international fields of policymaking is international security. Some of the most powerful institutions of the international order have the protection of international security at the core of their existence. Under the pretext of better protecting international security, States have created a strong but opaque net of international institutions that, nevertheless, have a deep impact not only on the rest of the international tissue, but also on national politics. The latest breed of policies concerning international security are the so-called targeted sanctions against international terrorism. These highly controversial anti-terrorism measures are a paradigmatic example of how international institutions develop their activity among the frictions between international policy-making and national sovereignty. How are international anti-terrorism policies crafted within international venues? In this class, we will dive into the intricacies of designing anti-terrorist policies within an international institution and the problems of enforcing them at the national level.Required Readings: - Francesco Giumelli (2015). "Understanding United Nations Targeted Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis." International Affairs, 91(6), pp. 1351-1368. |
8. Session 8: The International Court of Justice: decision-making between politics and lawAs said by Ian Hurd, in the international sphere ¿the legal and political domains are entirely interwoven¿. This connection is embodied in the institutional design of international courts like in no other international institution. A closer look to the features of the most prominent international courts will reveal international institutions¿ struggle to gain and maintain their independence under the sempiternal tension between national sovereignty and international obligations. This lesson specifically addresses the institutional design of the International Court of Justice in order to understand its turf battle for global political influence with other regional courts and the national interests behind it.Required Readings: - Ian Hurd. International Organizations; Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge University Press, pp. 192-225. |
9. Session 9: The International Criminal Court: Justice, Politics & LegitimacyHuman rights are a critical structure within the international order. Since 1948, when the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed, a vast infrastructure of human rights institutions has been created, involving virtually every state to some degree. There has, however, been significant debate about the impact of this regime. There are two opposing views: some see the human rights endeavor as being broadly successful, improving the lives of many around the world; others find that human rights institutions have done very little. This debate has also casted a large shadow over the International Criminal Court, which is the most sophisticated attempt to provide Human Rights with an independent and enforceable protection against the most heinous violations. The institutional design of this outstanding international court will reveal the political reasons behind its shortcomings.Required Readings: ¿ Ian Hurd. International Organizations; Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge University Press, pp. 226-247. |
10. Session 10: The World Bank, IMF and the Politics of Conditional LendingFinancial institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are by far the most important providers of international development assistance. But their funding also comes with conditions, which are often dictated by powerful states. Some argue that these conditions have been bad for development outcomes, raising the question of why developing states would participate in such programs. Their decisions are even more puzzling when we consider the fact that the number of lenders has increased in recent years, meaning that developing states increasingly have multiple ways of attaining the money they need. This week we explore these dynamics by considering how decisions are made in the World Bank and IMF, the impact of their programs on developing states, why developing states decide to participate in such programs, and how their calculations are changing as a result of shifts within the broader lending environment.Required Readings: ¿ Vreeland, James R (2006). The International Monetary Fund: The Politics of Conditional Lending. New York Routledge, Chapter 1. ¿ Woods, Ngaire (2003). ¿The United States and the International Financial Institutions: Power and Influence Within the World Bank and IMF¿ in Foot, MacFarlane, and Mastanduno (eds) US Hegemony and International Organizations: The United States and Multilateral Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
11. Session 11: The WTO, PTAs, and Policy Space: Constraining or Enabling Development?The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the central institution in the complex field of international trade, which comprises a range of bilateral, regional and multilateral arrangements. Its core objective is to foster open global markets, which are widely thought to foster peace and promote economic development. Yet it has repeatedly been the source of considerable controversy, particularly as it relates to developing states. This class explores these issues by examining the evolution of the WTO, PTAs and domestic politics in the trade regime. It looks at the central challenges states have faced when it comes to free trade, the different views about the role that different international institutions have played in achieving this goal, and the broader issues that these institutions raise, especially for the developing world.Required Readings: ¿ Goldstein, Judith (2012). ¿Trade Liberalization and Domestic Politics.¿ In Daunton, Narlikar & Stern (eds). Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization. ¿ Irwin, Douglas (2015). Free Trade Under Fire, 4th Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Chapter 7 (WTO, PTAs). |
Grupo | Profesor | Departamento |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | Gemma Lligadas González | Derecho |